Home
Blog
Brief History
Progressive
Oil and Slaves
Socialism
Special Interests
The Rich
Class Privilege
Antitrust and AIG
Financial Collapse
Mortgages
The Poor
Crime
Keynesian Economics
Autocracy: Rome, US
Fall of Rome
Economic Ideology
Capital Punishment
Left-wing Politics
Religion and Politics
Apocalypse
Gold Conspiracy
US Dollar and Empire
Mafia and...
Enviro- Disaster
"Free" Trade vs Labor
Bush Ideology
Terrorism
Capitalism
Black Markets
Social Security
Immigration
Ideal Tax
Reconstruction
Impeachment
Iraq: Pushing String
Escalation in Iraq
Imperialism
Conservative/Liberal?
We Need Context
Support the Troops
The Super-Rich
The Superpower
Ephesus as Metaphor
News and Media
Civil War
Winning
Abortion and Politics
What we have lost
Estate Tax
Global Warming
Climate Change
Terrorists
Racism
Privatizing
Structural Adjustment
Casino Royale
Gangsters
Skirts
A Great Nation
Student loans
No Child Left Behind
Blog Archives
Blog Archives 5
Blog Archives 6
Blog Archives 7
Books
Why this website?
Comments
Contact Me & Links
Correspondence
The Occupation
Third Party
New and Improved
Elections
Braveheart
Pakistan
Attila and Osama
Mittal
Blagojovich & Markets
Freedom
Fifth Century
A McCain moment
Blog + Comments

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

 

The Mafia, The Roman Empire
And GW Bush

The Mafia are small-time crooks compared to the Senators of fifth century Rome. They are the spiritual descendants of the Senatorial leaders who bankrupted the Roman Empire and then connived in its overthrow (in 476).

The Senators of the Roman Empire may have been the Mafia big-time, but they were small-time crooks compared to the Karl Roves and Dick Cheneys and GW Bushes of today. After all, the Roman legions only stole what they could carry, or drive off, like the thousands of captives sold into slavery and the golden candelabra of the Temple of Jerusalem. Their descendants in the fifth century drove people off the land and claimed it as their own, but they were working with inferior weapons. Today, the Halliburtons and Bechtels, the Lockheeds and Blackwaters, and the Chases and City Banks, have the weapons of capitalism, of finance and debt, of blocked assets, the IRS, the World Bank and the IMF to loot devastated countries--and their own.

Why, in Lebanon our war-profiteers didn't even have to lift a finger--they just kept the Israelis well-supplied with weapons. And now Lebanon is driven further into debt to all those who fatten on war and its aftermath. After all, Lebanon has to be rebuilt, and the money isn't going to come from nowhere, even though Lebanon was already in debt far beyond what it should have been before Israel and Hezbollah had at each other this summer.

Is it any coincidence that business is recording high profits in the US, but workers wages have only kept pace with inflation for this quarter, and have been falling in purchasing power for years? Workers have to keep their heads down, and if they get too uppity, start demanding wage increases, why the Fed decides there are "inflationary pressures," and has to raise interest rates--or their companies can threaten to relocate production to Mexico, or China, or India.

It's as if the Mafia was ruling the world, taking their cut--because they are protecting us--and killing anyone who gets in their way.

Except, of course, that our ruling gangsters are much more sophisticated than the Mafia; they don't have to kill the opposition, at least not usually. They just gain control of the election machinery, and of the media, declare a few "illegal enemy combatants," to show that anyone can end up in someplace like Guantànamo if they don't watch it, and then they sell fear: "Stay the course;" "Democrats are traitors;" "The Global War on Terror."

It's been very profitable. Their cut? Virtually all the productivity gains the US has sustained since 1980: those gains haven't ended up in the workers' pockets, but in the pockets of "investors" and of CEO's.

Think about it: has the Mafia ever been able to rip off the wealth not just of the powerless poor but of virtually everyone except themselves, to put shell corporations like Halliburton into place to skim off the cream from the whole society? The trick is to persuade enough people (50% plus or minus one will do, plus some Election Day chicanery) that they would be in more danger if they voted for the other guys. Look for a lot of expensive campaign ads claiming that the Democrats are soft on terrorism, and against Mom and apple pie. They only have to persuade enough to make the elections close; then the election machine companies can take care of the rest.

And after all, it isn't as if dollars can't substitute for votes. Long ago our then more liberal judiciary ruled in favor of "one man, one vote." But if you have a lot of dollars…our more conservative judiciary of today has ruled that dollars are equivalent to free speech, and no one wants to curtail free speech... For more on how to control election outcomes

No wonder the top 5% has sustained such income growth; no wonder the top 1/10th of 1% has garnered the greatest gains of all! They are the ones closest to the great Mafia organization affectionately known as the GOP, or to the big-time Mafia dons: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Hastert….


footer for Mafia page