Home
Blog
Brief History
Progressive
Oil and Slaves
Socialism
Special Interests
The Rich
Class Privilege
Antitrust and AIG
Financial Collapse
Mortgages
The Poor
Crime
Keynesian Economics
Autocracy: Rome, US
Fall of Rome
Economic Ideology
Capital Punishment
Left-wing Politics
Religion and Politics
Apocalypse
Gold Conspiracy
US Dollar and Empire
Mafia and...
Enviro- Disaster
"Free" Trade vs Labor
Bush Ideology
Terrorism
Capitalism
Black Markets
Social Security
Immigration
Ideal Tax
Reconstruction
Impeachment
Iraq: Pushing String
Escalation in Iraq
Imperialism
Conservative/Liberal?
We Need Context
Support the Troops
The Super-Rich
The Superpower
Ephesus as Metaphor
News and Media
Civil War
Winning
Abortion and Politics
What we have lost
Estate Tax
Global Warming
Climate Change
Terrorists
Racism
Privatizing
Structural Adjustment
Casino Royale
Gangsters
Skirts
A Great Nation
Student loans
No Child Left Behind
Blog Archives
Blog Archives 5
Blog Archives 6
Blog Archives 7
Books
Why this website?
Comments
Contact Me & Links
Correspondence
The Occupation
Third Party
New and Improved
Elections
Braveheart
Pakistan
Attila and Osama
Mittal
Blagojovich & Markets
Freedom
Fifth Century
A McCain moment
Blog + Comments

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

 

The Fall of Rome

The fall of Rome was not from a military siege; it was not from a military defeat; it was over a pay dispute between the young Emperor, Romulus Augustulus, and the general of the palatini, the magister militem in praesenti, by the name of Odoacer. He controlled what has sometimes been referred to as the Palace Guard, but it was much more than that. It was the part of the Field Army, the mobile army of the western Empire, stationed in central Italy, i.e. in and around Rome and Ravenna.

The fall of Rome was also a dispute between two principals: Odoacer, who was a Germanic Ostrogoth, and the Patrician Orestes, the Emperor's father, a Roman from Pannonia. Both Orestes and Odoacer's father, parenthetically, had served in Attila's court before it self-destructed. Legend even has it that the little Odoacer and the littler Romulus were both presented to Attila the Hun, a scene reproduced towards the end of my novel, Attila as Told to His Scribes, (available here as an e-book).

The fall of Rome might not have happened if the Senate had responded to Orestes' appeal, instead of giving in to Odoacer's demands, which is why the presence of a ruling selfish class was fatal. The fall of Rome also illuminates why a state should not depend on mercenaries, especially for troops protecting the capital.

The magister militem Odoacer demanded better pay for his troops, in the form of grants of land, estates, in central Italy. German troops had been granted large swathes of land in Gaul and Spain in the 80 years before 476, and had established largely independent kingdoms there, but no land had yet been granted in Italy, which was why Orestes refused to give in. He appealed to the Senate to raise the pay for the troops. Since some of the wealthy individual Senators earned incomes ($15-20 million per year at the current exchange) greater than the amount in question, his appeal was not unreasonable. But they refused. Instead, the Senators negotiated directly with Odoacer and they did so knowing that they had to come to an agreement quickly.

Why? Because Orestes had also appealed for help from the Roman Emperor in Constantinople (the eastern Roman Empire), and Emperor Zeno was about to send troops. The Senators knew that in the eastern half of the Empire, Senators were taxed. Rather than face a similar fate, they supported Odoacer, who announced the end of the western Roman Empire and his assumption of the title: King of Italy. The Senators thought, wrongly, that they could simply continue on as they had before.

What the Senators didn't realize was that the fall of Rome was only the beginning of a process that would end with almost all of their families gone, their riches dispersed, and Italy plunged into chaos for hundreds of years. The Senate did continue to meet for another sixty years, but except for its one pivotal moment in 476, the Senate had not exercised any power for many hundreds of years, having handed it over to the strongmen who called themselves Emperor, and now King.

The Senate had taken its one independent action: to cooperate in the fall of Rome.


footer for fall of rome page